You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Management of Adults With Hospital-acquired and Ventilator-associated Pneumonia: 2016 Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Thoracic Society
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Infectious Diseases, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1093/cid/ciw353 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andre C. Kalil, Mark L. Metersky, Michael Klompas, John Muscedere, Daniel A. Sweeney, Lucy B. Palmer, Lena M. Napolitano, Naomi P. O'Grady, John G. Bartlett, Jordi Carratalà, Ali A. El Solh, Santiago Ewig, Paul D. Fey, Thomas M. File, Marcos I. Restrepo, Jason A. Roberts, Grant W. Waterer, Peggy Cruse, Shandra L. Knight, Jan L. Brozek |
| Abstract |
It is important to realize that guidelines cannot always account for individual variation among patients. They are not intended to supplant physician judgment with respect to particular patients or special clinical situations. IDSA considers adherence to these guidelines to be voluntary, with the ultimate determination regarding their application to be made by the physician in the light of each patient's individual circumstances.These guidelines are intended for use by healthcare professionals who care for patients at risk for hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), including specialists in infectious diseases, pulmonary diseases, critical care, and surgeons, anesthesiologists, hospitalists, and any clinicians and healthcare providers caring for hospitalized patients with nosocomial pneumonia. The panel's recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of HAP and VAP are based upon evidence derived from topic-specific systematic literature reviews. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 316 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 77 | 24% |
| Saudi Arabia | 20 | 6% |
| Spain | 15 | 5% |
| Mexico | 8 | 3% |
| Japan | 8 | 3% |
| Canada | 7 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 6 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 47 | 15% |
| Unknown | 119 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 221 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 55 | 17% |
| Scientists | 36 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3,613 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 5 | <1% |
| Italy | 3 | <1% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | <1% |
| Unknown | 3586 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 437 | 12% |
| Other | 381 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 342 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 328 | 9% |
| Researcher | 302 | 8% |
| Other | 731 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1092 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1476 | 41% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 404 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 169 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 92 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 73 | 2% |
| Other | 232 | 6% |
| Unknown | 1167 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 410. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#73,038
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#212
of 16,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,558
of 372,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#1
of 145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.