↓ Skip to main content

ヘルスコミュニケーション学の新たな展開 進化生物学的視点によるがん対策への示唆

Overview of attention for article published in Iryo To Shakai, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ヘルスコミュニケーション学の新たな展開 進化生物学的視点によるがん対策への示唆
Published in
Iryo To Shakai, August 2020
DOI 10.4091/iken.30-91
Authors

奥原 剛, 木内 貴弘

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2021.
All research outputs
#15,485,623
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Iryo To Shakai
#34
of 86 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,334
of 426,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Iryo To Shakai
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 86 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them