↓ Skip to main content

Remote ischaemic preconditioning for heart surgery. The study design for a multi-center randomized double-blinded controlled clinical trial--the RIPHeart-Study.

Overview of attention for article published in European Heart Journal, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Remote ischaemic preconditioning for heart surgery. The study design for a multi-center randomized double-blinded controlled clinical trial--the RIPHeart-Study.
Published in
European Heart Journal, June 2012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick Meybohm, Kai Zacharowski, Jochen Cremer, Jan Roesner, Frank Kletzin, Gereon Schaelte, Marc Felzen, Ulrich Strouhal, Christian Reyher, Matthias Heringlake, Julika Schön, Ivo Brandes, Martin Bauer, Pascal Knuefermann, Maria Wittmann, Thomas Hachenberg, Thomas Schilling, Thorsten Smul, Sonja Maisch, Michael Sander, Tobias Moormann, Andreas Boening, Markus A Weigand, Rita Laufenberg, Christian Werner, Michael Winterhalter, Tanja Treschan, Sebastian N Stehr, Konrad Reinhart, Dirk Hasenclever, Oana Brosteanu, Berthold Bein

Abstract

Transient ischaemia of non-vital tissue has been shown to enhance the tolerance of remote organs to cope with a subsequent prolonged ischaemic event in a number of clinical conditions, a phenomenon known as remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC). However, there remains uncertainty about the efficacy of RIPC in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The purpose of this report is to describe the design and methods used in the "Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning for Heart Surgery (RIPHeart)-Study".

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 50%
Student > Postgraduate 2 50%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 75%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2012.
All research outputs
#17,289,387
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from European Heart Journal
#8,714
of 11,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,263
of 179,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Heart Journal
#65
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,049 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.