↓ Skip to main content

Effective population size remains a suitable, pragmatic indicator of genetic diversity for all species, including forest trees

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effective population size remains a suitable, pragmatic indicator of genetic diversity for all species, including forest trees
Published in
Biological Conservation, January 2021
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108906
Authors

Sean Hoban, Ivan Paz-Vinas, Sally Aitken, Laura D. Bertola, Martin F. Breed, Michael W. Bruford, W. Chris Funk, Catherine E. Grueber, Myriam Heuertz, Paul Hohenlohe, Margaret E. Hunter, Rodolfo Jaffé, Margarida Lopes Fernandes, Joachim Mergeay, Farideh Moharrek, David O'Brien, Gernot Segelbacher, Cristiano Vernesi, Lisette Waits, Linda Laikre

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 24%
Student > Master 10 14%
Other 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 50%
Environmental Science 8 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 9%
Unspecified 2 3%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 16 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,164,067
of 25,523,622 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#1,725
of 6,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,250
of 521,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#55
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,523,622 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 521,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.