Title |
BRCA2, ATM, and CDK12 Defects Differentially Shape Prostate Tumor Driver Genomics and Clinical AggressionBRCA2, ATM, and CDK12 in Prostate Cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Cancer Research, January 2021
|
DOI | 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-3708 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Evan Warner, Cameron Herberts, Simon Fu, Steven Yip, Amanda Wong, Gang Wang, Elie Ritch, Andrew J. Murtha, Gillian Vandekerkhove, Nicolette M. Fonseca, Arkhjamil Angeles, Arshia Beigi, Elena Schönlau, Kevin Beja, Matti Annala, Daniel Khalaf, Kim N. Chi, Alexander W. Wyatt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 8 | 23% |
United States | 6 | 17% |
Spain | 2 | 6% |
Belgium | 2 | 6% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Thailand | 1 | 3% |
Sweden | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 14 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 18 | 51% |
Scientists | 13 | 37% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 12% |
Unknown | 23 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 22% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 24 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,676,539
of 25,306,238 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#1,224
of 13,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,704
of 519,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#52
of 309 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,306,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 309 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.