| Title |
Genetic Engineering of Cyanobacteria to Enhance Biohydrogen Production from Sunlight and Water
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ambio, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13280-012-0275-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hajime Masukawa, Masaharu Kitashima, Kazuhito Inoue, Hidehiro Sakurai, Robert P. Hausinger |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Turkey | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 30% |
| Researcher | 16 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 11 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 8% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 15 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2016.
All research outputs
#4,191,823
of 22,880,691 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#691
of 1,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,668
of 160,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,691 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,629 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.