↓ Skip to main content

Phosphorus losses from monitored fields with conservation practices in the Lake Erie Basin, USA

Overview of attention for article published in Ambio, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
Title
Phosphorus losses from monitored fields with conservation practices in the Lake Erie Basin, USA
Published in
Ambio, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13280-014-0624-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Douglas R. Smith, Wendy Francesconi, Stan J. Livingston, Chi-hua Huang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 98 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 30%
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Other 4 4%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 12 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 30 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 23%
Engineering 14 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 17 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2016.
All research outputs
#23,391,126
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#1,935
of 1,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#335,884
of 391,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#36
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.