↓ Skip to main content

A Monte Carlo study of ranked efficiency estimates from frontier models

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Productivity Analysis, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
A Monte Carlo study of ranked efficiency estimates from frontier models
Published in
Journal of Productivity Analysis, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11123-011-0238-y
Authors

William C. Horrace, Seth Richards-Shubik

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 1 11%
Unknown 8 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 33%
Researcher 3 33%
Professor 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 78%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2012.
All research outputs
#20,167,959
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Productivity Analysis
#165
of 173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,920
of 120,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Productivity Analysis
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 173 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,663 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.