You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reviewing the Role of Parametrial Boost in Patients With Cervical Cancer With Clinically Involved Parametria and Staged With Positron Emission Tomography
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1097/igc.0b013e31826c4dee |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chrishanthi Rajasooriyar, Sylvia Van Dyk, Mery Lindawati, David Bernshaw, Srinivas Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan, Kailash Narayan |
| Abstract |
Primary objective was to validate the practice of not treating clinically involved parametria by parametrial boost. Secondary objective was to validate the adequacy of nodal boost in node-positive patients regardless of parametrial status. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 20% |
| Researcher | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 15% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 55% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2012.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
#2,203
of 3,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,312
of 179,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
#15
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,440 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.