Title |
Constrained Total Hip Megaprosthesis for Primary Periacetabular Tumors
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, September 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11999-012-2625-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Takafumi Ueda, Shigeki Kakunaga, Satoshi Takenaka, Nobuhito Araki, Hideki Yoshikawa |
Abstract |
Limb-salvage reconstruction for periacetabular malignant tumors is one of the most challenging problems in orthopaedic oncology. Reconstructive options include resection arthroplasty, endoprosthesis, allograft, recycled autobone graft, arthrodesis, and pseudarthrosis. However, no standard procedure exists because of rarity and clinical variability of the disease. We previously developed a megaprosthetic system with a constrained total hip mechanism (C-THA). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Spain | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ukraine | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 55 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 18% |
Other | 5 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
Other | 14 | 25% |
Unknown | 14 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 55% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 14 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2020.
All research outputs
#3,222,459
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#596
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,879
of 191,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#8
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.