↓ Skip to main content

Just one look: Direct gaze briefly disrupts visual working memory

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Just one look: Direct gaze briefly disrupts visual working memory
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, June 2016
DOI 10.3758/s13423-016-1097-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Jessica Wang, Ian A. Apperly

Abstract

Direct gaze is a salient social cue that affords rapid detection. A body of research suggests that direct gaze enhances performance on memory tasks (e.g., Hood, Macrae, Cole-Davies, & Dias, Developmental Science, 1, 67-71, 2003). Nonetheless, other studies highlight the disruptive effect direct gaze has on concurrent cognitive processes (e.g., Conty, Gimmig, Belletier, George, & Huguet, Cognition, 115(1), 133-139, 2010). This discrepancy raises questions about the effects direct gaze may have on concurrent memory tasks. We addressed this topic by employing a change detection paradigm, where participants retained information about the color of small sets of agents. Experiment 1 revealed that, despite the irrelevance of the agents' eye gaze to the memory task at hand, participants were worse at detecting changes when the agents looked directly at them compared to when the agents looked away. Experiment 2 showed that the disruptive effect was relatively short-lived. Prolonged presentation of direct gaze led to recovery from the initial disruption, rather than a sustained disruption on change detection performance. The present study provides the first evidence that direct gaze impairs visual working memory with a rapidly-developing yet short-lived effect even when there is no need to attend to agents' gaze.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 16 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 27 52%
Neuroscience 6 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 14 27%