↓ Skip to main content

Impact of tapering and discontinuation of bevacizumab in patients with progressive glioblastoma

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Impact of tapering and discontinuation of bevacizumab in patients with progressive glioblastoma
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11060-016-2206-x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Bevacizumab is frequently used in patients with progressive glioblastoma raising questions regarding frequency of treatments, dosage, duration of therapy and the possibility of tapering and discontinuation for selected patient groups. We retrospectively assessed the safety and outcome of tapering and discontinuation of bevacizumab therapy for reasons other than disease progression and toxicity in 19 patients with progressive glioblastoma receiving bevacizumab for at least 6 months. In 10 of the 19 patients tapering bevacizumab resulted in complete discontinuation and reinitiation after disease progression during halted treatment. As a comparison group 33 patients with bevacizumab for at least 6 months continuously dosed at 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks were selected. Age and Karnofsky performance status at start of bevacizumab were similar in both groups. Influenced by the selection process, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were longer in the group receiving a tapered and discontinued bevacizumab regimen (PFS 22.7 versus 11.2 months, HR 0.33, p-value = 0.01; OS 29.9 versus 15.5 months, HR 0.22, p-value = 0.001) with a median time of discontinuation of 4.5 months (range: 1.9-44.2 months). Stable disease or partial response according to RANO at ≥3 months was achieved in 89 % of patients with reinitiated bevacizumab therapy after discontinuation. These data indicate that tapering and discontinuation of bevacizumab therapy for other reasons than progression is feasible without an increased risk for tumor rebound or unresponsiveness to reinitiated bevacizumab therapy.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 25%
Researcher 5 25%
Other 1 5%
Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 35%
Neuroscience 2 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2016.
All research outputs
#14,951,052
of 23,923,788 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#1,895
of 3,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,984
of 360,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#22
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,923,788 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,072 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.