↓ Skip to main content

The role of AKT isoforms in glioblastoma: AKT3 delays tumor progression

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
The role of AKT isoforms in glioblastoma: AKT3 delays tumor progression
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11060-016-2220-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Joy, Manisha Kapoor, Joseph Georges, Lacy Butler, Yongchang Chang, Chaokun Li, Acacia Crouch, Ivan Smirnov, Mitsitoshi Nakada, James Hepler, Max Marty, Burt G. Feuerstein

Abstract

The growth factor receptor/PI3K/AKT pathway is an important drug target in many cancers including Glioblastoma. AKT, a key node in the pathway, has 3 isoforms, AKT1, AKT2 and AKT3. Here we investigate their role in GBM. We find each activated, ser473 phosphorylated isoform is present in some GBMs but expression patterns vary. There is a direct relationship between human GBM patient outcome and both AKT1 and AKT2 mRNA levels, but an inverse relationship with AKT3 mRNA. Furthermore, AKT3 mRNA levels were high in a less aggressive GBM subtype. Overexpressing AKT3 improves survival in a rodent model of GBM and decreases colony forming efficiency, but not growth rate, in glioma cells. Silencing AKT3 slows cell cycle progression in one cell line and increases apoptosis in another. Our studies of AKT3 substrates indicate (1) silencing both AKT2 and AKT3 reduces GSK3 phosphorylation (2) only AKT2 silencing reduces S6 phosphorylation. Since S6 phosphorylation is a marker of mTORC1 activity this indicates that AKT2 activates mTORC1, but AKT3 does not. Our results indicate AKT isoforms have different roles and downstream substrates in GBM. Unexpectedly, they indicate AKT3 delays tumor progression. Therefore strategies that inhibit AKT3 may be unhelpful in some GBM patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Portugal 1 3%
Unknown 34 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 28%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Master 5 14%
Professor 3 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 6%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 8 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 9 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2016.
All research outputs
#14,729,270
of 22,880,691 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#1,865
of 2,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,316
of 355,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#22
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,977 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.