↓ Skip to main content

To be spurned no more: The affective and behavioral consequences of social and nonsocial rejection

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
To be spurned no more: The affective and behavioral consequences of social and nonsocial rejection
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, July 2016
DOI 10.3758/s13423-016-1114-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel L. Driscoll, Pat Barclay, Mark J. Fenske

Abstract

Social pain is often associated with social rejection and shares neural correlates with the bothersome aspect of physical pain, which may also indicate an overlap in function. Pain has been described as a motivational signal to respond to the source of the pain in an adaptive way, such as by altering behavior. We tested whether social pain causes similarly adaptive alterations in behavior. Participants played computerized ball-tossing tasks with putative players-one who passed to and one who excluded the participant from play-in both a social and nonsocial version. We assessed the behavioral consequences of social pain by comparing the number of throws to each stimulus (social rejector vs. nonsocial rejector) over the course of the task. Posttask questionnaires assessed subjective feelings of social pain. A decrease in throws to the rejecting stimulus was only observed in the social version, indicating that rejection that is social in nature leads to change in behavior. Moreover, participants reported more negative feelings toward the rejecting stimulus in the social than in the nonsocial version. These subjective feelings of social pain mediated the effect of version of the game (social vs. nonsocial) on changes in behavior, indicating that social pain from social rejection causes changes in behavior.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 42 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 27%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 14%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 20 45%
Neuroscience 4 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Computer Science 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 12 27%