↓ Skip to main content

Parameterizing developmental changes in epistemic trust

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Parameterizing developmental changes in epistemic trust
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, July 2016
DOI 10.3758/s13423-016-1082-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Baxter S. Eaves, Patrick Shafto

Abstract

Children rely on others for much of what they learn, and therefore must track who to trust for information. Researchers have debated whether to interpret children's behavior as inferences about informants' knowledgeability only or as inferences about both knowledgeability and intent. We introduce a novel framework for integrating results across heterogeneous ages and methods. The framework allows application of a recent computational model to a set of results that span ages 8 months to adulthood and a variety of methods. The results show strong fits to specific findings in the literature trust, and correctly fails to fit one representative result from an adjacent literature. In the aggregate, the results show a clear development in children's reasoning about informants' intent and no appreciable changes in reasoning about informants' knowledgeability, confirming previous results. The results extend previous findings by modeling development over a much wider age range and identifying and explaining differences across methods.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 46 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 28%
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Researcher 3 6%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 9 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 29 62%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Linguistics 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 11 23%