↓ Skip to main content

Disease severity-specific neutrophil signatures in blood transcriptomes stratify COVID-19 patients

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Medicine, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
42 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
209 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
273 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Disease severity-specific neutrophil signatures in blood transcriptomes stratify COVID-19 patients
Published in
Genome Medicine, January 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13073-020-00823-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna C. Aschenbrenner, Maria Mouktaroudi, Benjamin Krämer, Marie Oestreich, Nikolaos Antonakos, Melanie Nuesch-Germano, Konstantina Gkizeli, Lorenzo Bonaguro, Nico Reusch, Kevin Baßler, Maria Saridaki, Rainer Knoll, Tal Pecht, Theodore S. Kapellos, Sarandia Doulou, Charlotte Kröger, Miriam Herbert, Lisa Holsten, Arik Horne, Ioanna D. Gemünd, Nikoletta Rovina, Shobhit Agrawal, Kilian Dahm, Martina van Uelft, Anna Drews, Lena Lenkeit, Niklas Bruse, Jelle Gerretsen, Jannik Gierlich, Matthias Becker, Kristian Händler, Michael Kraut, Heidi Theis, Simachew Mengiste, Elena De Domenico, Jonas Schulte-Schrepping, Lea Seep, Jan Raabe, Christoph Hoffmeister, Michael ToVinh, Verena Keitel, Gereon Rieke, Valentina Talevi, Dirk Skowasch, N. Ahmad Aziz, Peter Pickkers, Frank L. van de Veerdonk, Mihai G. Netea, Joachim L. Schultze, Matthijs Kox, Monique M. B. Breteler, Jacob Nattermann, Antonia Koutsoukou, Evangelos J. Giamarellos-Bourboulis, Thomas Ulas

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 273 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 18%
Researcher 43 16%
Student > Bachelor 36 13%
Student > Master 19 7%
Other 13 5%
Other 35 13%
Unknown 79 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 27 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 7%
Unspecified 9 3%
Other 45 16%
Unknown 92 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 107. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2021.
All research outputs
#394,777
of 25,440,205 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#66
of 1,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,337
of 523,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#2
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,440,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,588 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 523,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.