Title |
Whole-exome Sequencing in Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma Uncovers Novel Prognostic Categorization and Drug Targets Similar to Head and Neck Squamous Cell CarcinomaClinical Implications of WES in Penile Squamous Carcinoma
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Cancer Research, January 2021
|
DOI | 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-4004 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jad Chahoud, Frederico O. Gleber-Netto, Barrett Z. McCormick, Priya Rao, Xin Lu, Ming Guo, Maggaret B. Morgan, Randy A. Chu, Magaly Martinez-Ferrer, Agda Karina Eterovic, Curtis R. Pickering, Curtis A. Pettaway |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 10 | 59% |
India | 2 | 12% |
Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 65% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 24% |
Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 17% |
Researcher | 5 | 12% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 16 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 24% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 17% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 5% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 18 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2021.
All research outputs
#3,219,082
of 24,716,872 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#2,833
of 13,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,581
of 517,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#128
of 322 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,716,872 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,086 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 517,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 322 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.