↓ Skip to main content

The DASH Diet and Insulin Sensitivity

Overview of attention for article published in Current Hypertension Reports, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 798)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
Title
The DASH Diet and Insulin Sensitivity
Published in
Current Hypertension Reports, November 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11906-010-0168-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan L. Hinderliter, Michael A. Babyak, Andrew Sherwood, James A. Blumenthal

Abstract

Lifestyle modifications, including adoption of the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) dietary pattern, weight loss in individuals who are overweight or obese, and physical activity, are effective in the prevention and treatment of hypertension. A healthy lifestyle may also have beneficial effects on metabolic abnormalities, such as insulin resistance, that are associated with high blood pressure. This review examines the independent and combined effects of the DASH diet and weight loss plus exercise on blood pressure and insulin sensitivity, with a focus on recently published results from the ENCORE study. Our data suggest that the DASH eating plan alone lowers blood pressure in overweight individuals with higher than optimal blood pressure, but significant improvements in insulin sensitivity are observed only when the DASH diet is implemented as part of a more comprehensive lifestyle modification program that includes exercise and weight loss.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 127 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 16%
Student > Bachelor 19 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Student > Postgraduate 11 9%
Other 10 8%
Other 26 20%
Unknown 27 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Sports and Recreations 6 5%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 37 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2022.
All research outputs
#851,617
of 25,853,983 outputs
Outputs from Current Hypertension Reports
#31
of 798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,570
of 112,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Hypertension Reports
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,853,983 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them