↓ Skip to main content

Feo – Transport of Ferrous Iron into Bacteria

Overview of attention for article published in BioMetals, April 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
298 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
259 Mendeley
Title
Feo – Transport of Ferrous Iron into Bacteria
Published in
BioMetals, April 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10534-006-0003-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michaël L. Cartron, Sarah Maddocks, Paul Gillingham, C. Jeremy Craven, Simon C. Andrews

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 244 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 29%
Researcher 38 15%
Student > Bachelor 28 11%
Student > Master 20 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Other 43 17%
Unknown 39 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 94 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 54 21%
Chemistry 18 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 3%
Other 27 10%
Unknown 46 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,486,067
of 22,880,691 outputs
Outputs from BioMetals
#158
of 646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,489
of 66,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMetals
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 646 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,803 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.