You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 6th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2021
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0244878 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Elizabeth Gargon, Sarah L. Gorst, Karen Matvienko-Sikar, Paula R. Williamson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 50% |
United States | 1 | 17% |
Ireland | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
Other | 13 | 24% |
Unknown | 17 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 20% |
Sports and Recreations | 4 | 7% |
Psychology | 4 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 17% |
Unknown | 20 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2023.
All research outputs
#14,439,328
of 25,634,695 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#126,063
of 223,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,469
of 529,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,505
of 2,976 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,634,695 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 529,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,976 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.