↓ Skip to main content

Assessing learning and memory in pigs

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
115 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
292 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Assessing learning and memory in pigs
Published in
Animal Cognition, January 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10071-010-0364-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elise Titia Gieling, Rebecca Elizabeth Nordquist, Franz Josef van der Staay

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a surge of interest in (mini) pigs (Sus scrofa) as species for cognitive research. A major reason for this is their physiological and anatomical similarity with humans. For example, pigs possess a well-developed, large brain. Assessment of the learning and memory functions of pigs is not only relevant to human research but also to animal welfare, given the nature of current farming practices and the demands they make on animal health and behavior. In this article, we review studies of pig cognition, focusing on the underlying processes and mechanisms, with a view to identifying. Our goal is to aid the selection of appropriate cognitive tasks for research into pig cognition. To this end, we formulated several basic criteria for pig cognition tests and then applied these criteria and knowledge about pig-specific sensorimotor abilities and behavior to evaluate the merits, drawbacks, and limitations of the different types of tests used to date. While behavioral studies using (mini) pigs have shown that this species can perform learning and memory tasks, and much has been learned about pig cognition, results have not been replicated or proven replicable because of the lack of validated, translational behavioral paradigms that are specially suited to tap specific aspects of pig cognition. We identified several promising types of tasks for use in studies of pig cognition, such as versatile spatial free-choice type tasks that allow the simultaneous measurement of several behavioral domains. The use of appropriate tasks will facilitate the collection of reliable and valid data on pig cognition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 280 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 21%
Student > Master 45 15%
Researcher 42 14%
Student > Bachelor 32 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 4%
Other 47 16%
Unknown 52 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 112 38%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 26 9%
Psychology 25 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 4%
Neuroscience 13 4%
Other 41 14%
Unknown 62 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,979,625
of 25,651,057 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#418
of 1,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,582
of 192,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,651,057 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,580 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.