You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prognostic Utility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy: Substudy of a Randomized Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Pediatrics, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.284 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeanie L. Y. Cheong, Lee Coleman, Rod W. Hunt, Katherine J. Lee, Lex W. Doyle, Terrie E. Inder, Susan E. Jacobs, for the Infant Cooling Evaluation Collaboration |
| Abstract |
To investigate the effects of hypothermia treatment on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) patterns of brain injury in newborns with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy compared with normothermia, including the prognostic utility of MRI for death and/or disability at a postnatal age of 2 years. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 151 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 14% |
| Other | 20 | 13% |
| Researcher | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 18% |
| Unknown | 35 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 74 | 48% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 7% |
| Psychology | 6 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 3% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 44 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2015.
All research outputs
#15,170,530
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Pediatrics
#5,628
of 6,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,283
of 176,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Pediatrics
#26
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 79.4. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.