You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Muscle strength assessment in critically ill patients with handheld dynamometry: An investigation of reliability, minimal detectable change, and time to peak force generation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Critical Care, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.03.001 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claire E. Baldwin, Jennifer D. Paratz, Andrew D. Bersten |
| Abstract |
Dynamometry is an objective tool for volitional strength evaluation that may overcome the limited sensitivity of the Medical Research Council scale for manual muscle tests, particularly at grades 4 and 5. The primary aims of this study were to investigate the reliability, minimal detectable change, and time to peak muscle force, measured with portable dynamometry, in critically ill patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 187 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 42 | 22% |
| Researcher | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 35 | 18% |
| Unknown | 47 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 42 | 22% |
| Engineering | 6 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Unknown | 55 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2018.
All research outputs
#14,599,159
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Critical Care
#1,390
of 2,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,302
of 174,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Critical Care
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.