↓ Skip to main content

The Relationship Among Sexual Attitudes, Sexual Fantasy, and Religiosity

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
Title
The Relationship Among Sexual Attitudes, Sexual Fantasy, and Religiosity
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, April 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10508-010-9621-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tierney K. Ahrold, Melissa Farmer, Paul D. Trapnell, Cindy M. Meston

Abstract

Recent research on the impact of religiosity on sexuality has highlighted the role of the individual, and suggests that the effects of religious group and sexual attitudes and fantasy may be mediated through individual differences in spirituality. The present study investigated the role of religion in an ethnically diverse young adult sample (N = 1413, 69% women) using religious group as well as several religiosity domains: spirituality, intrinsic religiosity, paranormal beliefs, and fundamentalism. Differences between religious groups in conservative sexual attitudes were statistically significant but small; as predicted, spirituality mediated these effects. In contrast to the weak effects of religious group, spirituality, intrinsic religiosity, and fundamentalism were strong predictors of women's conservative sexual attitudes; for men, intrinsic religiosity predicted sexual attitude conservatism but spirituality predicted attitudinal liberalism. For women, both religious group and religiosity domains were significant predictors of frequency of sexual fantasies while, for men, only religiosity domains were significant predictors. These results indicate that individual differences in religiosity domains were better predictors of sexual attitudes and fantasy than religious group and that these associations are moderated by gender.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Israel 1 <1%
Georgia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Bosnia and Herzegovina 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 179 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 16%
Student > Master 25 13%
Student > Bachelor 25 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 11%
Researcher 19 10%
Other 33 18%
Unknown 33 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 86 46%
Social Sciences 26 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 6%
Arts and Humanities 7 4%
Philosophy 4 2%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 36 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 91. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2021.
All research outputs
#389,012
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#222
of 3,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,020
of 95,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#3
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,446 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.