| Title |
The Role of Practitioner Resilience and Mindfulness in Effective Practice: A Practice-Based Feasibility Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10488-016-0747-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jo-Ann Pereira, Michael Barkham, Stephen Kellett, David Saxon |
| Abstract |
A growing body of literature attests to the existence of therapist effects with little explanation of this phenomenon. This study therefore investigated the role of resilience and mindfulness as factors related to practitioner wellbeing and associated effective practice. Data comprised practitioners (n = 37) and their patient outcome data (n = 4980) conducted within a stepped care model of service delivery. Analyses employed benchmarking and multilevel modeling to identify more and less effective practitioners via yoking of therapist factors and nested patient outcomes. A therapist effect of 6.7 % was identified based on patient depression (PHQ-9) outcome scores. More effective practitioners compared to less effective practitioners displayed significantly higher levels of mindfulness as well as resilience and mindfulness combined. Implications for policy, research and practice are discussed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 5 | 42% |
| United States | 2 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 170 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 9% |
| Researcher | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 31 | 18% |
| Unknown | 43 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 76 | 45% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 51 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2022.
All research outputs
#4,759,684
of 25,410,626 outputs
Outputs from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#161
of 715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,432
of 372,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,410,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.