↓ Skip to main content

Does adenoid hypertrophy affect disease severity in children with allergic rhinitis?

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Does adenoid hypertrophy affect disease severity in children with allergic rhinitis?
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00405-016-4196-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mahmut Dogru, Muhammed Fatih Evcimik, Omer Faruk Calim

Abstract

Our study aims to evaluate the presence of adenoid hypertrophy (AH) in children with allergic rhinitis (AR) and the association of AH disease severity and clinical laboratory finding from retrospective, cross-sectional, and nonrandomized trial. The study included 566 children being treated and followed up for allergic rhinitis. Skin prick test for the same allergens was performed for all patients. Adenoid tissue was analyzed by an ENT specialist and the diagnosis was confirmed based on the patient history, endoscopic physical examination and radiology. Adenoid hypertrophy was detected in 118 (21.2 %) of the children with AR. Children with and without AH did not differ statistically and significantly by gender, age, presence of atopy in the family, exposure to smoke (p > 0.05). Comparison of the groups for AR duration demonstrated significantly higher frequency of persistent rhinitis in patients with AH (p < 0.05). Of the AR patients with AH, 90 (76.3 %) had moderate-severe rhinitis and 274 (62.6 %) AR patients without AH had moderate-severe rhinitis (p = 0.005). Itchy nose was more frequent in AR patients without AH, and nasal congestion was more common in AR patients with AH (p = 0.017 and p = 0.001, respectively). The presence of asthma was more common among AR patients without AH (p = 0.037). Intergroup comparisons for presence of atopic dermatitis, the percentage of eosinophil, serum IgE levels, the number of positive sensitivity, polysensitization, sensitivity to house dust mite, cockroach, pollens and dander yielded no significant difference (p > 0.05). On the other hand, sensitivity to Alternaria alternata was significantly more frequent in AR patients with AH (p = 0.032). The presence of AH increased the severity of the disease and prolongs disease duration. There was a negative relationship between AH and asthma in children with AR. AH is more common among children with mold sensitivity. AH should be considered and investigated particularly in non-asthmatic children with pronounced nasal congestion and A. alternata sensitivity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 14%
Researcher 7 13%
Other 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 17 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Mathematics 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 20 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2017.
All research outputs
#5,522,333
of 22,880,691 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#259
of 3,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,725
of 354,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#7
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,691 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,078 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.