| Title |
Scales of nutrient-limited phytoplankton productivity in Chesapeake Bay
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Estuaries and Coasts, June 1996
|
| DOI | 10.2307/1352457 |
| Authors |
Thomas C. Malone, Daniel J. Conley, Thomas R. Fisher, Patricia M. Glibert, Lawrence W. Harding, Kevin G. Sellner |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 138 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 40 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 12% |
| Unknown | 20 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 52 | 36% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 27% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 23 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2016.
All research outputs
#2,951,185
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Estuaries and Coasts
#124
of 1,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,240
of 27,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Estuaries and Coasts
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,901 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 27,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.