You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evolution of antibody immunity to SARS-CoV-2
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-021-03207-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christian Gaebler, Zijun Wang, Julio C. C. Lorenzi, Frauke Muecksch, Shlomo Finkin, Minami Tokuyama, Alice Cho, Mila Jankovic, Dennis Schaefer-Babajew, Thiago Y. Oliveira, Melissa Cipolla, Charlotte Viant, Christopher O. Barnes, Yaron Bram, Gaëlle Breton, Thomas Hägglöf, Pilar Mendoza, Arlene Hurley, Martina Turroja, Kristie Gordon, Katrina G. Millard, Victor Ramos, Fabian Schmidt, Yiska Weisblum, Divya Jha, Michael Tankelevich, Gustavo Martinez-Delgado, Jim Yee, Roshni Patel, Juan Dizon, Cecille Unson-O’Brien, Irina Shimeliovich, Davide F. Robbiani, Zhen Zhao, Anna Gazumyan, Robert E. Schwartz, Theodora Hatziioannou, Pamela J. Bjorkman, Saurabh Mehandru, Paul D. Bieniasz, Marina Caskey, Michel C. Nussenzweig |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5,439 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 530 | 10% |
| United States | 475 | 9% |
| Spain | 365 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 200 | 4% |
| Poland | 118 | 2% |
| Japan | 87 | 2% |
| Germany | 81 | 1% |
| Mexico | 78 | 1% |
| Turkey | 66 | 1% |
| Other | 701 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2738 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4687 | 86% |
| Scientists | 486 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 194 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 71 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,364 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1364 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 231 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 156 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 123 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 107 | 8% |
| Other | 83 | 6% |
| Other | 230 | 17% |
| Unknown | 434 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 230 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 194 | 14% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 170 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 79 | 6% |
| Engineering | 29 | 2% |
| Other | 175 | 13% |
| Unknown | 487 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4309. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,070
of 25,791,495 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#100
of 98,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67
of 534,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#6
of 842 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 534,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 842 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.