| Title |
Interspecific relationships of aufwuchs-eating fishes in Lake Tanganyika
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Biology of Fishes, May 1984
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00001476 |
| Authors |
Kenzi Takamura |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 35 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 47% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
| Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 66% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 5 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2016.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Biology of Fishes
#602
of 1,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,487
of 8,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Biology of Fishes
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,952 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 8,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them