↓ Skip to main content

Structural Attacks for Public Key Cryptosystems based on Gabidulin Codes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cryptology, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Structural Attacks for Public Key Cryptosystems based on Gabidulin Codes
Published in
Journal of Cryptology, September 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00145-007-9003-9
Authors

R. Overbeck

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 45 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 25%
Student > Master 9 19%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 8 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 23 48%
Mathematics 8 17%
Engineering 2 4%
Physics and Astronomy 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 9 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,486,067
of 22,880,691 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cryptology
#89
of 238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,922
of 70,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cryptology
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.