↓ Skip to main content

Correlates of Staying Safe Behaviors Among Long-Term Injection Drug Users: Psychometric Evaluation of the Staying Safe Questionnaire

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Correlates of Staying Safe Behaviors Among Long-Term Injection Drug Users: Psychometric Evaluation of the Staying Safe Questionnaire
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, October 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10461-011-0079-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Vazan, Pedro Mateu-Gelabert, Charles M. Cleland, Milagros Sandoval, Samuel R. Friedman

Abstract

We report on psychometric properties of a new questionnaire to study long-term strategies, practices and tactics that may help injection drug users (IDUs) avoid infection with HIV and hepatitis C. Sixty-two long-term IDUs were interviewed in New York City in 2009. Five scales based on a total of 47 items were formed covering the following domains: stigma avoidance, withdrawal prevention, homeless safety, embedding safety within a network of users, and access to resources/social support. All scales (α ≥ .79) except one (α = .61) were highly internally consistent. Seven single-item measures related to drug use reduction and injection practices were also analyzed. All variables were classified as either belonging to a group of symbiotic processes that are not directly focused upon disease prevention but nonetheless lead to risk reduction indirectly or as variables describing prevention tactics in risky situations. Symbiotic processes can be conceived of as unintentional facilitators of safe behaviors. Associations among variables offer suggestions for potential interventions. These Staying Safe variables can be used as predictors of risk behaviors and/or biological outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 4%
Unknown 53 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 16%
Student > Master 7 13%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 15 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 10 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 11%
Psychology 6 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 16 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2012.
All research outputs
#4,205,779
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#606
of 3,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,054
of 143,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#9
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.