↓ Skip to main content

Population studies on hill building wood-ants of the Formica rufa-group

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, March 1981
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Population studies on hill building wood-ants of the Formica rufa-group
Published in
Oecologia, March 1981
DOI 10.1007/bf00346504
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. Klimetzek

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 5%
Germany 1 5%
Unknown 19 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 29%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Other 5 24%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 62%
Environmental Science 2 10%
Materials Science 1 5%
Unknown 5 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2019.
All research outputs
#7,486,067
of 22,880,691 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,679
of 4,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,742
of 7,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,224 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.