| Title |
Ending Laminations and Cannon–Thurston Maps
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Geometric and Functional Analysis, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00039-014-0263-x |
| Authors |
Mahan Mj |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 50% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 33% |
| Researcher | 1 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematics | 5 | 83% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2023.
All research outputs
#7,845,540
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Geometric and Functional Analysis
#37
of 178 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,861
of 311,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geometric and Functional Analysis
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 178 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.