| Title |
Differences in Pyrenoid Morphology Are Correlated with Differences in the rbcL Genes of Members of the Chloromonas Lineage (Volvocales, Chlorophyceae)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Molecular Evolution, October 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00239-002-2338-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hisayoshi Nozaki, Keisuke Onishi, Eiko Morita |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 44 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 61% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 22% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2016.
All research outputs
#7,486,067
of 22,880,691 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#452
of 1,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,694
of 46,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 46,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.