↓ Skip to main content

A reassessment of large theropod dinosaur tracks from the mid-Cretaceous (late Albian–Cenomanian) Winton Formation of Lark Quarry, central-western Queensland, Australia: A case for mistaken identity

Overview of attention for article published in Cretaceous Research, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A reassessment of large theropod dinosaur tracks from the mid-Cretaceous (late Albian–Cenomanian) Winton Formation of Lark Quarry, central-western Queensland, Australia: A case for mistaken identity
Published in
Cretaceous Research, April 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.cretres.2010.11.003
Authors

Anthony Romilio, Steven W. Salisbury

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 2 4%
Poland 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 49 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 22%
Researcher 9 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 32 59%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 15%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 8 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,433,747
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Cretaceous Research
#246
of 2,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,554
of 120,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cretaceous Research
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,347 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.