You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Native American fire management at an ancient wildland–urban interface in the Southwest United States
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2018733118 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher I. Roos, Thomas W. Swetnam, T. J. Ferguson, Matthew J. Liebmann, Rachel A. Loehman, John R. Welch, Ellis Q. Margolis, Christopher H. Guiterman, William C. Hockaday, Michael J. Aiuvalasit, Jenna Battillo, Joshua Farella, Christopher A. Kiahtipes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 92 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 41 | 45% |
| Canada | 4 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 36 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 65 | 71% |
| Scientists | 25 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 130 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 22% |
| Researcher | 23 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 37 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 34 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 15% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 4% |
| Engineering | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 44 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 167. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2023.
All research outputs
#241,874
of 25,383,225 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#4,519
of 102,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,003
of 519,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#112
of 1,029 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,383,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 102,846 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,029 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.