You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effortful Listening: The Processing of Degraded Speech Depends Critically on Attention
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Neuroscience, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1523/jneurosci.1528-12.2012 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Conor J. Wild, Afiqah Yusuf, Daryl E. Wilson, Jonathan E. Peelle, Matthew H. Davis, Ingrid S. Johnsrude |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 344 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 321 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 98 | 28% |
| Researcher | 66 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 41 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 5% |
| Professor | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 58 | 17% |
| Unknown | 48 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 87 | 25% |
| Neuroscience | 59 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 8% |
| Engineering | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 48 | 14% |
| Unknown | 70 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2019.
All research outputs
#20,356,726
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroscience
#21,652
of 24,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,885
of 195,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroscience
#282
of 357 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 357 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.