You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Screening for type 2 diabetes and population mortality over 10 years (ADDITION-Cambridge): a cluster-randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61422-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rebecca K Simmons, Justin B Echouffo-Tcheugui, Stephen J Sharp, Lincoln A Sargeant, Kate M Williams, A Toby Prevost, Ann Louise Kinmonth, Nicholas J Wareham, Simon J Griffin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 143 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 22 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 21 | 15% |
| United States | 17 | 12% |
| Canada | 9 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 3% |
| Japan | 4 | 3% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| Argentina | 2 | 1% |
| Iceland | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 49 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 95 | 66% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 28 | 20% |
| Scientists | 15 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 357 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 2% |
| Unknown | 332 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 57 | 16% |
| Researcher | 52 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 35 | 10% |
| Other | 32 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 9% |
| Other | 89 | 25% |
| Unknown | 61 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 189 | 53% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 36 | 10% |
| Unknown | 76 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 186. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2023.
All research outputs
#218,765
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#2,502
of 42,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,068
of 192,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#15
of 500 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,994 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 500 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.