You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
NABat: A top-down, bottom-up solution to collaborative continental-scale monitoring
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ambio, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13280-020-01411-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brian E. Reichert, Mylea Bayless, Tina L. Cheng, Jeremy T. H. Coleman, Charles M. Francis, Winifred F. Frick, Benjamin S. Gotthold, Kathryn M. Irvine, Cori Lausen, Han Li, Susan C. Loeb, Jonathan D. Reichard, Thomas J. Rodhouse, Jordi L. Segers, Jeremy L. Siemers, Wayne E. Thogmartin, Theodore J. Weller |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 37% |
| Canada | 3 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| Colombia | 2 | 7% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 52% |
| Scientists | 10 | 37% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 20 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 16 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 26 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,837,929
of 23,340,595 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#322
of 1,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,985
of 502,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#17
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,340,595 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,651 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 502,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.