↓ Skip to main content

The role of cacao plantations in maintaining forest avian diversity in southeastern Costa Rica

Overview of attention for article published in Agroforestry Systems, October 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
Title
The role of cacao plantations in maintaining forest avian diversity in southeastern Costa Rica
Published in
Agroforestry Systems, October 2001
DOI 10.1023/a:1013328621106
Authors

R. Reitsma, J. D. Parrish, W. McLarney

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 2%
United States 3 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Unknown 156 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 18%
Researcher 28 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 14%
Professor 15 9%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Other 33 20%
Unknown 25 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 77 46%
Environmental Science 41 24%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 29 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Agroforestry Systems
#268
of 1,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,239
of 44,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Agroforestry Systems
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,028 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 44,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.