↓ Skip to main content

Best Practice Guidelines for use of OSCEs: Maximising value for student learning

Overview of attention for article published in Nurse Education Today, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Best Practice Guidelines for use of OSCEs: Maximising value for student learning
Published in
Nurse Education Today, June 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.nedt.2010.05.006
Pubmed ID
Authors

D.D. Nulty, M.L. Mitchell, C.A. Jeffrey, A. Henderson, M. Groves

Abstract

Objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) are a regular component of Bachelor of Nursing (BN) programs within Australia and internationally. OSCEs are a valuable strategy to assess 'fitness to practice' at the students' expected level of clinical practice within a nursing context where the importance of accurate patient assessment is paramount. This report discusses the integration of seven proposed 'Best Practice Guidelines' (BPG) into an undergraduate BN program in Queensland, Australia. A range of learning and assessment strategies was introduced in accordance with the adoption of these guidelines to maximise student engagement. There is some evidence that these strategies have directly assisted in enhanced student confidence around clinical practice and provide preliminary evidence of the effectiveness of BPG for OSCEs within nursing programs internationally.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Unknown 211 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 17%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Researcher 19 9%
Lecturer 15 7%
Student > Postgraduate 15 7%
Other 64 29%
Unknown 47 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 50 23%
Social Sciences 19 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Psychology 5 2%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 48 22%