↓ Skip to main content

Dissecting the interaction between transglutaminase 2 and fibronectin

Overview of attention for article published in Amino Acids, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Dissecting the interaction between transglutaminase 2 and fibronectin
Published in
Amino Acids, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00726-016-2296-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Inês Cardoso, Eva Christina Østerlund, Jorunn Stamnaes, Rasmus Iversen, Jan Terje Andersen, Thomas J. D. Jørgensen, Ludvig M. Sollid

Abstract

In the extracellular environment, the enzyme transglutaminase 2 (TG2) is involved in cell-matrix interactions through association with the extracellular matrix protein, fibronectin (FN). The 45 kDa gelatin-binding domain of FN (45FN) is responsible for the binding to TG2. Previous studies have demonstrated that the FN-binding site of TG2 is located in the N-terminal domain of the enzyme although with conflicting results regarding the specific residues involved. Here we have mapped the FN interaction site of human TG2 by use of hydrogen/deuterium exchange coupled with mass spectrometry, and we confirm that the FN-binding site is located in the N-terminal domain of TG2. Furthermore, by combination of site-directed mutagenesis and surface plasmon resonance analysis we have identified the TG2 residues K30, R116 and H134 as crucial to maintain the high affinity interaction with FN. Mutation of all three residues simultaneously reduced binding to 45FN by more than 2000-fold. We also identified residues in the catalytic core domain of TG2 that contributed to FN binding, hence extending the binding interface between TG2 and FN. This study provides new insights into the high affinity interaction between TG2 and FN.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 28%
Researcher 7 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Professor 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 12 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 11%
Chemistry 2 6%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 13 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2016.
All research outputs
#20,335,770
of 22,880,691 outputs
Outputs from Amino Acids
#1,287
of 1,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#308,108
of 354,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Amino Acids
#23
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,522 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.