You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Modeling plant species distributions under future climates: how fine scale do climate projections need to be?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Global Change Biology, November 2012
|
DOI | 10.1111/gcb.12051 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Janet Franklin, Frank W. Davis, Makihiko Ikegami, Alexandra D. Syphard, Lorraine E. Flint, Alan L. Flint, Lee Hannah |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 20% |
Hong Kong | 1 | 20% |
United States | 1 | 20% |
Puerto Rico | 1 | 20% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 3 | 60% |
Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 628 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 19 | 3% |
Brazil | 6 | <1% |
Italy | 3 | <1% |
France | 3 | <1% |
Spain | 3 | <1% |
Colombia | 2 | <1% |
Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
Germany | 2 | <1% |
Australia | 2 | <1% |
Other | 22 | 4% |
Unknown | 564 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 168 | 27% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 141 | 22% |
Student > Master | 76 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 37 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 34 | 5% |
Other | 105 | 17% |
Unknown | 67 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 249 | 40% |
Environmental Science | 204 | 32% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 39 | 6% |
Engineering | 9 | 1% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | <1% |
Other | 24 | 4% |
Unknown | 97 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2013.
All research outputs
#1,927,461
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from Global Change Biology
#2,415
of 6,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,671
of 197,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Change Biology
#16
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,430 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.