↓ Skip to main content

Impaired cerebrovascular autoregulation in patients with severe sepsis and sepsis-associated delirium

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
Title
Impaired cerebrovascular autoregulation in patients with severe sepsis and sepsis-associated delirium
Published in
Critical Care, October 2012
DOI 10.1186/cc11665
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick Schramm, Klaus Ulrich Klein, Lena Falkenberg, Manfred Berres, Dorothea Closhen, Konrad J Werhahn, Matthias David, Christian Werner, Kristin Engelhard

Abstract

ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: Sepsis-associated delirium (SAD) increases morbidity in septic patients and, therefore, factors contributing to SAD should be further characterized. One possible mechanism might be the impairment of cerebrovascular autoregulation (AR) by sepsis, leading to cerebral hypo- or hyperperfusion in these haemodynamically unstable patients. Therefore, the present study investigates the relationship between the incidence of SAD and the status of AR during sepsis. METHODS: Cerebral blood flow velocity was measured using transcranial Doppler sonography and was correlated with the invasive arterial blood pressure curve to calculate the index of AR Mx (Mx>0.3 indicates impaired AR). Mx was measured daily during the first 4 days of sepsis. Diagnosis of a SAD was performed using the confusion assessment method for ICU (CAM-ICU) and, furthermore the predominant brain electrical activity in electroencephalogram (EEG) both at day 4 after reduction of sedation to RASS >-2. RESULTS: 30 critically ill adult patients with severe sepsis or septic shock (APACHE II 32 ± 6) were included. AR was impaired at day 1 in 60%, day 2 in 59%, day 3 in 41% and day 4 in 46% of patients; SAD detected by CAM-ICU was present in 76 % of patients. Impaired AR at day 1 was associated with the incidence of SAD at day 4 (p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: AR is impaired in the great majority of patients with severe sepsis during the first two days. Impaired AR is associated with SAD, suggesting that dysfunction of AR is one of the trigger mechanisms contributing to the development of SAD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01029080.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
United States 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Unknown 159 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 14%
Researcher 22 13%
Student > Master 16 10%
Student > Postgraduate 15 9%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Other 46 28%
Unknown 29 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 89 54%
Neuroscience 12 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 36 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2016.
All research outputs
#3,135,523
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,585
of 6,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,053
of 194,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#17
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.