| Title |
A Citation Analysis of Business Ethics Research: A Global Perspective
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Business Ethics, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10551-014-2533-9 |
| Authors |
Kam C. Chan, Anna Fung, Hung-Gay Fung, Jot Yau |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 100 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 20% |
| Unknown | 19 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 45 | 45% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 12 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 21 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2016.
All research outputs
#3,027,069
of 24,739,153 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#532
of 3,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,281
of 362,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#9
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,739,153 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,145 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.