You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Using realist action research for service redesign
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Evaluation, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1177/1356389016656514 |
| Authors |
Gill Westhorp, Kaye Stevens, Patricia J. Rogers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 35% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 9 | 53% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 47% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 119 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 26% |
| Researcher | 23 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 18% |
| Unknown | 19 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 44 | 36% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 5% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 29 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2021.
All research outputs
#3,377,067
of 24,290,096 outputs
Outputs from Evaluation
#63
of 411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,122
of 361,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evaluation
#12
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,290,096 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.