↓ Skip to main content

Facilitative interactions do not wane with warming at high elevations in the Andes

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
Title
Facilitative interactions do not wane with warming at high elevations in the Andes
Published in
Oecologia, April 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00442-012-2316-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lohengrin A. Cavieres, Angela Sierra-Almeida

Abstract

Positive interactions between species are known to play an important role in the structure and dynamics of alpine plant communities. The balance between negative and positive interactions is known to shift along spatial and temporal gradients, with positive effects prevailing over negative ones as the environmental stress increases. Thus, this balance is likely to be affected by climate change. We hypothesized that increases in temperature (a global warming scenario) should decrease the importance of positive interactions for the survival and growth of alpine plant species. To test this hypothesis, we selected individuals of the native grass species Hordeum comosum growing within the nurse cushion species Azorella madreporica at 3,600 m.a.s.l. in Los Andes (Chile), and performed nurse removal and seedling survival experiments under natural and warmer conditions. For warmer conditions, we used open-top chambers, which increased the temperature by 4 °C. After two growing seasons, we compared the effect of nurse removal on the survival, biomass, and photochemical efficiency of H. comosum individuals under warmer and natural conditions. Nurse removal significantly decreased the survival, biomass, and photochemical efficiency of H. comosum, demonstrating the facilitative effects of nurse cushions. Seedling survival was also enhanced by cushions, even under warmer conditions. However, warmer conditions only partially mitigated the negative effects of nurse removal, suggesting that facilitative effects of cushions do not wane under warmer conditions. Thus, facilitative interactions are vital to the performance and survival of alpine species, and these positive interactions will continue to be important in the warmer conditions of the future in high-alpine habitats.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 102 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 22%
Student > Master 17 15%
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 14 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 41%
Environmental Science 27 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 9%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 18 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2012.
All research outputs
#15,251,976
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#3,245
of 4,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,655
of 161,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#14
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.