↓ Skip to main content

Development of a test battery to enhance safe return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Overview of attention for article published in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
31 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
212 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
579 Mendeley
Title
Development of a test battery to enhance safe return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00167-016-4246-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alli Gokeler, Wouter Welling, Stefano Zaffagnini, Romain Seil, Darin Padua

Abstract

There is a lack of consensus regarding the appropriate criteria for releasing patients to return to sports (RTS) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). A test battery was developed to support decision-making. Twenty-eight patients (22 males and 6 females) with a mean age of 25.4 ± 8.2 years participated and were 6.5 ± 1.0 months post-ACLR. All patients followed the same rehabilitation protocol. The test battery used consisted of the following: isokinetic test, 3 hop tests and the jump-landing task assessed with the LESS. The isokinetic tests and single-leg hop tests were expressed as a LSI (involved limb/uninvolved limb × 100 %). In addition, patients filled out the IKDC and ACL-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) scale. RTS criteria to pass were defined as a LSI > 90 % on isokinetic and hop tests, LESS < 5, ACL-RSI > 56 and a IKDC within 15th percentile of healthy subjects. Two out of 28 patients passed all criteria of the test protocol. The pass criterion for the LESS < 5 was reached by 67.9 % of all patients. For the hop tests, 78.5 % of patients passed LSI > 90 % for SLH, 85.7 % for TLH and 50 % for the SH. For the isokinetic test, 39.3 % of patients passed criteria for LSI peak torque quadriceps at 60°/s, 46.4 % at 180°/s and 42.9 at 300°/s. In total, 35.7 % of the patients passed criterion for the peak torque at 60°/s normalized to BW (>3.0 Nm) for the involved limb. The H/Q ratio at 300°/s > 55 % for females was achieved by 4 out of 6 female patients, and the >62.5 % criterion for males was achieved by 75 %. At 6 months post-ACLR, 85.7 % of the patients passed the IKDC score and 75 % the ACL-RSI score >56 criteria. The evidence emerging from this study suggests that the majority of patients who are 6 months after ACLR require additional rehabilitation to pass RTS criteria. The RTS battery described in this study may serve as a framework for future studies to implement multivariate models in order to optimize the decision-making regarding RTS after ACLR with the aim to reduce incidence of second ACL injuries. III.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 579 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 576 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 105 18%
Student > Bachelor 84 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 8%
Other 42 7%
Researcher 35 6%
Other 93 16%
Unknown 172 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 126 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 114 20%
Sports and Recreations 94 16%
Engineering 12 2%
Social Sciences 8 1%
Other 33 6%
Unknown 192 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2019.
All research outputs
#1,551,252
of 23,323,574 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#137
of 2,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,393
of 358,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#5
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,323,574 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.