| Title |
Electronic Health Records and Ambulatory Quality of Care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-012-2237-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lisa M. Kern, Yolanda Barrón, Rina V. Dhopeshwarkar, Alison Edwards, Rainu Kaushal, with the HITEC Investigators |
| Abstract |
The US Federal Government is investing up to $29 billion in incentives for meaningful use of electronic health records (EHRs). However, the effect of EHRs on ambulatory quality is unclear, with several large studies finding no effect. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 52% |
| Jordan | 4 | 14% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 72% |
| Scientists | 4 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 212 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 47 | 21% |
| Unknown | 46 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 27% |
| Social Sciences | 24 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 17 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 32 | 14% |
| Unknown | 55 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2020.
All research outputs
#757,916
of 25,199,971 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#605
of 8,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,007
of 180,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#6
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,199,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,117 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.