↓ Skip to main content

The Carnegie Curve

Overview of attention for article published in Surveys in Geophysics, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
155 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
The Carnegie Curve
Published in
Surveys in Geophysics, December 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10712-012-9210-2
Authors

R. Giles Harrison

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Student > Master 12 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Professor 6 7%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 14 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 23 28%
Physics and Astronomy 12 15%
Engineering 8 10%
Environmental Science 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 18 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2023.
All research outputs
#6,441,814
of 22,880,691 outputs
Outputs from Surveys in Geophysics
#98
of 282 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,761
of 279,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surveys in Geophysics
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 282 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.